The Manchurian
Candidate (1962) (****)
review by Jon
Waterman
The
quick thinking and good fighting of one man, Raymond Shaw,
save a group of American soldiers fighting in Korea. He returns
to the US and is awarded the Medal of Honor for his work. The
other men in the platoon return to the US with swirling confused
thoughts in their heads. They, including commanding officer
Major Bennett Marco, are having dreams of being captured and
brainwashed by the Koreans. They believe that the “heroic” mission
actually never happened and there may be something bigger political
conspiracy in the works with an election coming up. Can the
difference between paranoia and truth be pieced together before
it’s too late?
I’ll let you in on a little secret. They were captured
and brainwashed. You’ll learn that very early on in the
film. What makes the story so compelling and suspenseful isn’t
the mystery of if it happened, but rather why it happened and
how the whole thing will play out. George Axlerod’s adaptation
of Richard Condon’s novel is very solid. We’re
given the right information at the right time. We’re
left in the dark as much as Marco, who’s investigating
the ordeal. We’re treated to little surprises throughout
to tease us until the big plot points are revealed.
One of the most interesting things about the film is that
it continues to be suspenseful and intriguing even though the
pace is relatively slow. There is no non-stop action. Events
are absorbed, not merely stated. Director John Frankenheimer
uses long shots with large pauses in dialogue frequently, letting
the visuals speak for themselves. The audience becomes just
as much of a detective as Marco. You can also attribute this
to the editing of Ferris Webster, who does a remarkable job
on this film. The brainwashing scene brilliantly cuts between
what the soldiers believe is happening (an old lady giving
a presentation about flowers) and what is really happening
(the presenter showing off the conquest of the minds to various
foreign representatives). It’s more menacing and chilling
hearing the old lady tell Shaw to shoot his fellow soldier
than if it was the doctor.
The acting is magnificent as well. Laurence Harvey as Shaw
refuses to let us into his mind even when providing us with
key background information. He forges a character that you
want to like, but, because of his distance, can’t. Frank
Sinatra as Marco is understated and thorough in his portrayal.
He doesn’t go off the deep end questioning his dreams
but rather deals with it all introspectively. Angela Lansbury
plays Shaw’s mother who is domineering and intrusive.
She is the true standout here. She’s ruthless and cold,
but there’s still that underlying sense of misguided
love. You can’t stand her, but you respect her capabilities.
Her screen presence is one of the most disturbing yet fascinating
performances I’ve seen.
The script is great. The directing is great. The editing is
great. The acting is great. The music is a little obtrusive
at beginning, but otherwise is appropriately haunting. The
ending will leave you in disarray. In short, this is one of
the best political thrillers out there.
respond to jon@filmbrats.com
|